Quantcast
Channel: iRedMail — iRedMail Support
Viewing all 43471 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

postfix rpm question

April 20, 2017, 4:57 pm
$
0
0

==== Required information ====
- iRedMail version (check /etc/iredmail-release): 0.9.6
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version: centos 7.3
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL): Mariadb
- Web server (Apache or Nginx):Nginx
- Manage mail accounts with iRedAdmin-Pro? not at this time.
- Related log if you're reporting an issue:
====

Hi,

Is there a changelog for the rpms you supply for iredmail? In particular, what are the differences between the postfix rpm you supply and postfix supplied by Centos? The version numbers are the same and I see that you bumped the epoch but I cannot easily tell what the real changes are.

Regards,

Tom

↧
Search

Re: SpamAssassin Bayes doesn't really work

April 20, 2017, 11:02 pm
$
0
0
ZhangHuangbin wrote:

Please enable debug mode in Amavisd to debug SpamAssassin. FYI:
http://www.iredmail.org/docs/debug.amavisd.html

Hi,

I enabled it, here a log:

Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running body tests; score so far=1.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running uri tests; score so far=1.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running rawbody tests; score so far=1.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running full tests; score so far=1.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running meta tests; score so far=1.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: check: running tests for priority: -950
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running one_line_body tests; score so far=1.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running head tests; score so far=1.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running head_eval tests; score so far=1.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran eval rule ALL_TRUSTED ======> got hit (1)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running body tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running uri tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running rawbody tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running full tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running meta tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: check: running tests for priority: -900
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running one_line_body tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running head tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running head_eval tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running body tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running uri tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running rawbody tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running full tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running meta tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: check: running tests for priority: -400
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running one_line_body tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running head tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running body tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running uri tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running body_eval tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running rawbody tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running full tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running meta tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: check: running tests for priority: 0
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running one_line_body tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: zoom: run_body_fast_scan for body_0 start
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: zoom: run_body_fast_scan for body_0 done
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running head tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __TB_MIME_BDRY_NO_Z ======> got hit: "boundary="------------9354837634511393"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ANY ======> got hit: "multipart/alternative"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT ======> got hit: "multipart/alternative"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY ======> got hit: "boundary"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY ======> got hit: "boundary"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __CT ======> got hit: "<YES>"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __HAS_DATE ======> got hit: "<YES>"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __DOS_RCVD_FRI ======> got hit: " Fri, "
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __HAS_RCVD ======> got hit: "<YES>"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __MISSING_REPLY ======> got hit: "UNSET"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __HAS_MSGID ======> got hit: "<"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __SANE_MSGID ======> got hit: "<LVy8qQNAs76NBEgjkrPLtz9NzLR3pimov8SOG8_Th_g.Dxe-jwVJf7dQzlvx7tKuqF_Ilqw5EmxSKP1VmhitmWI@beheathy.com>
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: [...] "
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __HAS_SUBJECT ======> got hit: "<YES>"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __NUMBERS_IN_SUBJ ======> got hit: "616"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __MISSING_REF ======> got hit: "UNSET"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __HAS_TO ======> got hit: "<YES>"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __HAS_FROM ======> got hit: "<YES>"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __TOCC_EXISTS ======> got hit: "<YES>"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __MSGID_OK_HOST ======> got hit: "@beheathy.com>"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __HAS_MESSAGE_ID ======> got hit: "<YES>"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran header rule __MIME_VERSION ======> got hit: "<YES>"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running head_eval tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: dkim: signatures provided by the caller, 0 signatures
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: dkim: signature verification result: none
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: dkim: adsp: performing lookup on _adsp._domainkey.beheathy.com
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: dkim: adsp result: U/unknown (dns: unknown), author domain 'beheathy.com'
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: spf: checking to see if the message has a Received-SPF header that we can use
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: spf: no suitable relay for spf use found, skipping SPF check
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: spf: already checked for Received-SPF headers, proceeding with DNS based checks
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: spf: no suitable relay for spf use found, skipping SPF-helo check
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: spf: def_spf_whitelist_from: already checked spf and didn't get pass, skipping whitelist check
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: RULE (FREEMAIL_FROM) check_freemail_from
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: all from-addresses: cecil@beheathy.com
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: RULE (__freemail_replyto) check_freemail_replyto
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: From address: cecil@beheathy.com
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: Reply-To is not freemail, skipping check
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: RULE (__smf_freemail_hdr_replyto) check_freemail_header
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: header Reply-To:addr not found from mail
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: RULE (FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT) check_freemail_header regex:\\d@
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: address from header EnvelopeFrom: cecil@beheathy.com
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: dkim: author cecil@beheathy.com, not in any dkim whitelist
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: RULE (__freemail_reply) check_freemail_replyto
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: From address: cecil@beheathy.com
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: No Reply-To and From is not freemail, skipping check
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: spf: whitelist_from_spf: already checked spf and didn't get pass, skipping whitelist check
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: RULE (FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT) check_freemail_header regex:\\d@
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: header Reply-To not found from mail
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: RULE (__freemail_hdr_replyto) check_freemail_header
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: FreeMail: header Reply-To not found from mail
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: eval: From 2nd level domain: beheathy.com, EnvelopeFrom 2nd level domain: beheathy.com
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran eval rule __ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH ======> got hit (1)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running body tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran body rule __BODY_TEXT_LINE ======> got hit: "Y"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran body rule __BODY_TEXT_LINE ======> got hit: "A"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran body rule __BODY_TEXT_LINE ======> got hit: "W"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran body rule __NONEMPTY_BODY ======> got hit: "Y"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running uri tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran uri rule __LOCAL_PP_NONPPURL ======> got hit: "http://bars.beheathy.com"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran uri rule __DOS_HAS_ANY_URI ======> got hit: "h"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running body_eval tests; score so far=0.949
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: eval: body_length - 7363 - check for min of 512
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran eval rule HTML_MESSAGE ======> got hit (1)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran eval rule __HTML_LINK_IMAGE ======> got hit (1)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: eval: body_length - 7363 - check for min of 1024
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran eval rule __ANY_TEXT_ATTACH_DOC ======> got hit (1)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran eval rule __TAG_EXISTS_HTML ======> got hit (1)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran eval rule __ANY_TEXT_ATTACH ======> got hit (1)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran eval rule __TVD_MIME_ATT_TP ======> got hit (1)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: eval: body_length - 7363 - check for min of 128
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: eval: text words: 64, html words: 68
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: eval: madiff: left: 12, orig: 68, max-difference: 17.65%
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran eval rule __TAG_EXISTS_META ======> got hit (1)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran eval rule __MIME_HTML ======> got hit (1)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran eval rule __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD ======> got hit (1)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: eval: body_length - 7363 - check for min of 256
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran eval rule __TAG_EXISTS_BODY ======> got hit (1)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running rawbody tests; score so far=0.95
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran rawbody rule __BUGGED_IMG ======> got hit: "<img src="http://bars.beheathy.com/dohokoku/xhuec17512drbz/.com/11f6e2EE38"
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running rawbody_eval tests; score so far=0.95
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running full tests; score so far=0.95
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules-all: running full rule NULL_IN_BODY
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules-all: running full rule __BASE64_MDAW
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running full_eval tests; score so far=0.95
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: ran eval rule __DKIM_DEPENDABLE ======> got hit (1)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: pyzor: pyzor is not available: no pyzor executable found
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: pyzor: no pyzor found, disabling Pyzor
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running meta tests; score so far=0.95
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: check: running tests for priority: 500
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: dns: harvest_dnsbl_queries
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: dns: dns reply to 27083/IN/A/23.222.67.194.sbl.spamhaus.org: NXDOMAIN
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: calling callback on key DNSBL:23.222.67.194:sbl.spamhaus.org, rule URIBL_SBL_A
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: uridnsbl: complete_dnsbl_lookup URIBL_SBL_A DNSBL:23.222.67.194:sbl.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: dns: dns reply to 55811/IN/A/23.222.67.194.zen.spamhaus.org: NXDOMAIN
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: calling callback on key DNSBL:23.222.67.194:zen.spamhaus.org, rule URIBL_SBL
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: uridnsbl: complete_dnsbl_lookup URIBL_SBL DNSBL:23.222.67.194:zen.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: dns: dns reply to 1981/IN/A/86.59.245.173.zen.spamhaus.org: NXDOMAIN
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: calling callback on key DNSBL:86.59.245.173:zen.spamhaus.org, rule URIBL_SBL
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: uridnsbl: complete_dnsbl_lookup URIBL_SBL DNSBL:86.59.245.173:zen.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: dns: dns reply to 10288/IN/A/86.59.245.173.sbl.spamhaus.org: NXDOMAIN
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: calling callback on key DNSBL:86.59.245.173:sbl.spamhaus.org, rule URIBL_SBL_A
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: uridnsbl: complete_dnsbl_lookup URIBL_SBL_A DNSBL:86.59.245.173:sbl.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: dns: dns reply to 42191/IN/A/221.58.245.173.zen.spamhaus.org: NXDOMAIN
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: calling callback on key DNSBL:221.58.245.173:zen.spamhaus.org, rule URIBL_SBL
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: uridnsbl: complete_dnsbl_lookup URIBL_SBL DNSBL:221.58.245.173:zen.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: dns: dns reply to 45027/IN/A/221.58.245.173.sbl.spamhaus.org: NXDOMAIN
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: calling callback on key DNSBL:221.58.245.173:sbl.spamhaus.org, rule URIBL_SBL_A
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: uridnsbl: complete_dnsbl_lookup URIBL_SBL_A DNSBL:221.58.245.173:sbl.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: select found no responses ready (t.o.=0.0)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: completed in 0.057 s: URIBL_SBL, URI-DNSBL, DNSBL:86.59.245.173:zen.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: completed in 0.057 s: URIBL_SBL, URI-DNSBL, DNSBL:221.58.245.173:zen.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: completed in 0.059 s: URIBL_SBL, URI-DNSBL, DNSBL:23.222.67.194:zen.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.003 . A:chuck.ns.cloudflare.com
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.003 . A:sharon.ns.cloudflare.com
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.005 . NS:beheathy.com
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.006 . A:bars.beheathy.com
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.006 . dns:MX:beheathy.com
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.006 . dns:A:beheathy.com
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.007 . DNSBL:beheathy.com:dob.sibl.support-intelligence.net
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.007 . DNSBL:beheathy.com:multi.uribl.com
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.013 . DNSBL:beheathy.com:dbl.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.014 . DNSBL:beheathy.com:multi.surbl.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.057 . DNSBL:221.58.245.173:zen.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.057 . DNSBL:221.58.245.173:sbl.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.057 . DNSBL:86.59.245.173:zen.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.058 . DNSBL:86.59.245.173:sbl.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.059 . DNSBL:23.222.67.194:zen.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: async: timing: 0.059 . DNSBL:23.222.67.194:sbl.spamhaus.org
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: check: tagrun - tag RBL is now ready, value: <dns:beheathy.com> [194.67.222.160]
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running one_line_body tests; score so far=0.95
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running head tests; score so far=0.95
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running body tests; score so far=0.95
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running uri tests; score so far=0.95
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running body_eval tests; score so far=0.95
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running rawbody tests; score so far=0.95
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running full tests; score so far=0.95
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: rules: running meta tests; score so far=0.95
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn: currently using scoreset 1
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn: adding body_only points 1.948
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn: adding body_only points 0.001
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn: adding head_only points 0.01
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn: message score: 0.96, computed score for autolearn: 1.959
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn? ham=0.1, spam=12, body-points=1.949, head-points=0.01, learned-points=0
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn? no: inside auto-learn thresholds, not considered ham or spam
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: check: is spam? score=0.96 required=5
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: check: tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_REMOTE_IMAGE,URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL,URIBL_BLOCKED
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: check: subtests=__ANY_TEXT_ATTACH,__ANY_TEXT_ATTACH_DOC,__BODY_TEXT_LINE,__BODY_TEXT_LINE,__BODY_TEXT_LINE,__BUGGED_IMG,__CT,__CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY,__CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT,__CTYPE_MULTIP
ART_ANY,__DKIM_DEPENDABLE,__DOS_HAS_ANY_URI,__DOS_RCVD_FRI,__ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH,__HAS_ANY_URI,__HAS_DATE,__HAS_FROM,__HAS_MESSAGE_ID,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_RCVD,__HAS_SUBJECT,__HAS_TO,__HAS_URI,__HTML_LINK_IMAGE,__KHOP_NO_FULL_NAME,__LCL_
_ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH,__LOCAL_PP_NONPPURL,__MIME_HTML,__MIME_VERSION,__MISSING_REF,__MISSING_REPLY,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__NONEMPTY_BODY,__NOT_SPOOFED,__NUMBERS_IN_SUBJ,__REMOTE_IMAGE,__SANE_MSGID,__TAG_EXISTS_BODY,__TAG_EXISTS_HEAD,__TAG_EX
ISTS_HTML,__TAG_EXISTS_META,__TB_MIME_BDRY_NO_Z,__TOCC_EXISTS,__TVD_MIME_ATT_TP
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: timing: total 84 ms - parse: 1.04 (1.2%), b_tie_ro: 1.14 (1.4%), extract_message_metadata: 11 (12.9%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.93 (1.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 12 (14.5%), tests_pri_-950: 
1.27 (1.5%), tests_pri_-900: 0.95 (1.1%), tests_pri_-400: 0.84 (1.0%), tests_pri_0: 47 (56.7%), check_dkim_adsp: 1.66 (2.0%), check_spf: 0.34 (0.4%), check_pyzor: 0.17 (0.2%), tests_pri_500: 4.4 (5.3%)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) SA dbg: check: tagrun - tag DKIMDOMAIN is still blocking action 0
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail postfix/smtpd[3826]: connect from mail.domain.com[127.0.0.1]
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail postfix/smtpd[3826]: 305ED2EA1B9C: client=mail.domain.com[127.0.0.1]
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail postfix/cleanup[3822]: 305ED2EA1B9C: message-id=<LVy8qQNAs76NBEgjkrPLtz9NzLR3pimov8SOG8_Th_g.Dxe-jwVJf7dQzlvx7tKuqF_Ilqw5EmxSKP1VmhitmWI@beheathy.com>
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail postfix/smtpd[3826]: disconnect from mail.domain.com[127.0.0.1]
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail postfix/qmgr[26234]: 305ED2EA1B9C: from=<cecil@beheathy.com>, size=8842, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) FWD from <cecil@beheathy.com> -> <myaccount@domain.com>,RET=HDRS BODY=7BIT 250 2.0.0 from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 305ED2EA1B9C
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail amavis[19083]: (19083-06) Passed CLEAN {RelayedInternal}, MYNETS LOCAL [192.168.1.1]:41651 [192.168.1.1] <cecil@beheathy.com> -> <myaccount@domain.com>, Queue-ID: A5D8D2EA1B09, Message-ID: <LVy8qQNAs76NBEgjkrPLtz9NzLR3p
imov8SOG8_Th_g.Dxe-jwVJf7dQzlvx7tKuqF_Ilqw5EmxSKP1VmhitmWI@beheathy.com>, mail_id: S0RzTfc6HwrJ, Hits: 0.96, size: 8119, queued_as: 305ED2EA1B9C,Subject: "You have (amazon-prime) hot product of the day 61637621", From: "_Karla"_<cecil@beheathy.com>, helo=beheathy.com, Tests: [ALL_TRUSTED=-1,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01,URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL=1.948,URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001], autolearn=no autolearn_force=no, autolearnscore=1.959, 324 ms
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail postfix/smtp[3823]: A5D8D2EA1B09: to=<myaccount@domain.com>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=0.67, delays=0.26/0/0/0.4, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
 305ED2EA1B9C)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail postfix/qmgr[26234]: A5D8D2EA1B09: removed
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail postfix/pipe[3827]: 305ED2EA1B9C: to=<myaccount@domain.com>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.31, delays=0.06/0/0/0.24, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via dovecot service)
Apr 21 05:51:39 mail postfix/qmgr[26234]: 305ED2EA1B9C: removed

This is clearly a SPAM but it wasn't marked. Maybe I need more items on DB or I have something wrong.
I have another post talking same, maybe you can close it to avoid duplicate post:
http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic1260 … assin.html

Thanks.

↧
↧

iredapd letting email be sent to alias islist when it should reject it

April 21, 2017, 12:23 am
$
0
0

==== Required information ====
- iRedMail version (check /etc/iredmail-release): 0.9.6 MYSQL edition.
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version: Ubuntu 16.04 X86_64
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL): MySQL
- Web server (Apache or Nginx): Apache
- Manage mail accounts with iRedAdmin-Pro? No
- Related log if you're reporting an issue:
====

I set up an email alias list as per the instructions at http://www.iredmail.org/docs/sql.create.mail.alias.html

I set the accesspolicy='domain' in the alias table but the server still let emails through from a different domain. My list is called #test@domain1.com

This is what I saw in the iredapd  log file

2017-04-21 08:11:57 INFO 77.x.x.x RCPT, ben@domain2.com => #test@domain1.com, REJECT Not authorized [0.0210s]
2017-04-21 08:11:58 INFO 77.x.x.x END-OF-MESSAGE, ben@domain2.com => #test@domain1.com, DUNNO [0.0070s]

I'm not sure how iredapd works, but I'm guessing it goes over each plugin in turn checking each one to see if the message should be rejected or not.

It looks like the sql_alias_access_policy  plugin correctly rejected the message, but then maybe another plugin or some other rule has overridden the REJECT and made it DUNNO

Any tips on how I should debug this?

Regards

Ben

↧

Re: iredapd letting email be sent to alias islist when it should reject it

April 21, 2017, 12:46 am
$
0
0

I turned debug on to see if it would give me any extra info.

2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG Connect from 127.0.0.1, port 36420.
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: request=smtpd_access_policy
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: protocol_state=RCPT
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: protocol_name=ESMTP
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: client_address=77.x.x.x
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: client_name=xxxxx
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: client_port=29804
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: reverse_client_name=xxxxx
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: helo_name=[10.0.0.13]
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: sender=ben@domain2.com
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: recipient=#test@domain1.com
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: recipient_count=0
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: queue_id=
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: instance=3a3c.58f9b4fd.2d92f.0
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: size=0
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: etrn_domain=
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: stress=
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: sasl_method=PLAIN
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: sasl_username=ben@domain2.com
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: sasl_sender=
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: ccert_subject=
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: ccert_issuer=
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: ccert_fingerprint=
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: ccert_pubkey_fingerprint=
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: encryption_protocol=TLSv1.2
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: encryption_cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: encryption_keysize=256
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG smtp session: policy_context=
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG --> Apply plugin: reject_null_sender
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG <-- Result: DUNNO
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG --> Apply plugin: reject_sender_login_mismatch
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG Sender: ben@vanilla.net, SASL username: ben@domain2.com
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG SKIP: sender == sasl username.
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG <-- Result: DUNNO
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG --> Apply plugin: greylisting
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG Found SASL username, bypass greylisting for outbound email.
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG <-- Result: DUNNO
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG --> Apply plugin: throttle
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG Check sender throttling.
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG [SQL] Query throttle setting:

        SELECT id, account, priority, period, max_msgs, max_quota, msg_size
          FROM throttle
         WHERE kind='outbound' AND account IN ('77.x.x.x', '@ip', '@.', 'ben@domain2.com', '@domain2.com', '@.domain2.com', '@net', '@.net', '77.x.x.*', '77.x.*.x')
         ORDER BY priority DESC
         
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG [SQL] Query result:
[]
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG No sender throttle setting.
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG Bypass recipient throttling (found sasl_username).
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG <-- Result: DUNNO
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG --> Apply plugin: sql_alias_access_policy
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG [SQL] query access policy:
SELECT accesspolicy, goto, moderators
               FROM alias
              WHERE address='#test@domain1.com'
                    AND islist=1
                    AND active=1
              LIMIT 1
   
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG SQL query result: ('domain', 'goto@domain1.com', '')
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG Access policy: domain
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG members: goto@domain1.com
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG moderators:
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG [SQL] query alias domains:
SELECT alias_domain
               FROM alias_domain
              WHERE
                    alias_domain='domain2.com'
                    AND target_domain='domain1.com'
              LIMIT 1
             
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG No alias domain.
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG <-- Result: REJECT Not authorized
2017-04-21 08:30:05 DEBUG Session ended.
2017-04-21 08:30:05 INFO 77.x.x.x RCPT, ben@domain2.com => #test@domain1.com, REJECT Not authorized [0.0107s]
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG Connect from 127.0.0.1, port 36430.
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: request=smtpd_access_policy
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: protocol_state=END-OF-MESSAGE
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: protocol_name=ESMTP
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: client_address=77.x.x.x
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: client_name=xxxxx
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: client_port=29804
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: reverse_client_name=xxxxxx
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: helo_name=[10.0.0.13]
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: sender=ben@domain2.com
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: recipient=#test@domain1.com
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: recipient_count=1
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: queue_id=3597B6462A
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: instance=3a3c.58f9b4fd.2d92f.0
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: size=2452
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: etrn_domain=
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: stress=
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: sasl_method=PLAIN
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: sasl_username=ben@domain2.com
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: sasl_sender=
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: ccert_subject=
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: ccert_issuer=
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: ccert_fingerprint=
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: ccert_pubkey_fingerprint=
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: encryption_protocol=TLSv1.2
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: encryption_cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: encryption_keysize=256
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG smtp session: policy_context=
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG Skip plugin: reject_null_sender (protocol_state != END-OF-MESSAGE)
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG Skip plugin: reject_sender_login_mismatch (protocol_state != END-OF-MESSAGE)
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG Skip plugin: greylisting (protocol_state != END-OF-MESSAGE)
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG --> Apply plugin: throttle
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG Check sender throttling.
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG [SQL] Query throttle setting:

        SELECT id, account, priority, period, max_msgs, max_quota, msg_size
          FROM throttle
         WHERE kind='outbound' AND account IN ('77.x.x.x', '@ip', '@.', 'ben@domain2.com', '@domain2.com', '@.domain2.com', '@net', '@.net', '77.x.x.*', '77.x.*.x')
         ORDER BY priority DESC
         
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG [SQL] Query result:
[]
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG No sender throttle setting.
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG Bypass recipient throttling (found sasl_username).
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG <-- Result: DUNNO
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG Skip plugin: sql_alias_access_policy (protocol_state != END-OF-MESSAGE)
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG Skip plugin: amavisd_wblist (protocol_state != END-OF-MESSAGE)
2017-04-21 08:30:06 DEBUG Session ended.
2017-04-21 08:30:06 INFO 77.x.x.x END-OF-MESSAGE, ben@domain2.com => #test@domain1.com, DUNNO [0.0091s]

So it looks like its connecting twice, I'm assuming thats once before amavis and once after it. The first time its being rejected, but postfix is not having any of that, and passing it on for delivery anyway.

↧

Re: iredapd letting email be sent to alias islist when it should reject it

April 21, 2017, 12:48 am
$
0
0

main.cf

# Recipient restrictions
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
    reject_unknown_recipient_domain
    reject_non_fqdn_recipient
    reject_unlisted_recipient
    check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:7777
    permit_mynetworks
    permit_sasl_authenticated
    reject_unauth_destination

# END-OF-MESSAGE restrictions
smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions =
    check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:7777

So the 2 times are actually once for the smtpd_recipient_restrictions (which was rejected, but ignored by postfix) and once for smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions.

Is it because smtpd_recipient_restrictions is then going on to allow the email because the ben@domain2.com address is sasl authenticated, and thus check_policy_service is being overridden by permit_sasl_authenticated?

↧
↧

Re: Iredmail hooks / notifications on mail reception

April 21, 2017, 12:57 am
$
0
0

Hi,

I have the same isssue, have you found a solution  ?
Is it possible to configure iredmail to use the external database with hooks ?
Please help me, I'm stuck

Thanks

↧

Re: Set Postfix to relay only for users not found or relay outgoing only?

April 21, 2017, 1:07 am
$
0
0

Hello and thank you for your assistance.  I purchased the iredadmin-pro panel to make my life easier.  I set up the catchall but it would not deliver.  I believe something may have changed when I upgraded to pro, because I was previously able to send out to the exchange server with a same domain.


Edit: I was able to get email TO iredmail to work from the exchange server using the information in the following thread:
http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic1190 … hange.html

I'm still working on outgoing emails TO the exchange server.  It doesn't seem to like the catchall just yet.

I apologize for the editing and for the assistance.  It seems that the catchall doesn't work as expected.  I must not have something configured correctly.  If I add exchangeuser@mydomain.com to the iredmail server and set up the relay for that specific user, it works.  catchall@ does not seem to work.

I am hoping there is an easier way than importing all of my exchange users and modifying their relay settings.  Once again, thank you in advance for your assistance.

↧

Re: postscreen and Haproxy

April 21, 2017, 7:07 am
$
0
0

try

10023     inet  n      -     n     -     1     postscreen
 -o postscreen_upstream_proxy_protocol=haproxy

submission inet n       -       n       -       -       smtpd
....
-o smtpd_upstream_proxy_protocol=haproxy
  -o smtpd_upstream_proxy_timeout=30s

remove postscreen_upstream_proxy_protocol = haproxy in main.cf

↧
Search

Re: Iredmail hooks / notifications on mail reception

April 21, 2017, 7:12 am
$
0
0

Maybe quarantine all clean email to amavis database.
then use it to another program.

at /etc/amavis/conf.d/50-user

↧
↧

Unable to login into dovecot

April 21, 2017, 7:48 am
$
0
0

==== Required information ====
- iRedMail version (check /etc/iredmail-release):  0.9.6 OPENLDAP edition.
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version: Debain Jessie
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL): LDAP - Active Directory
- Web server (Apache or Nginx): NGINX
- Manage mail accounts with iRedAdmin-Pro? NO
- Related log if you're reporting an issue:
====

mail.log

Apr 21 09:41:01 ostala postfix/cleanup[1423]: A38F43C422AE: message-id=<20170421144101.50B953C422E1@ostala.doucl.com>
Apr 21 09:41:01 ostala postfix/10025/smtpd[1430]: disconnect from localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Apr 21 09:41:01 ostala postfix/qmgr[1387]: A38F43C422AE: from=<sogo@ostala.doucl.com>, size=1437, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 21 09:41:01 ostala amavis[1409]: (01409-03) Passed CLEAN {RelayedInbound}, [127.0.0.1] <sogo@ostala.doucl.com> -> <sogo@ostala.doucl.com>, Message-ID: <20170421144101.50B953C422E1@ostala.doucl.com>, mail_id: Jo6XfsipcGYK, Hits: 0, size: 949, queued_as: A38F43C422AE, 174 ms, Tests: [NO_RELAYS=-0.001,TVD_SPACE_RATIO=0.001]
Apr 21 09:41:01 ostala postfix/smtp-amavis/smtp[1792]: 50B953C422E1: to=<sogo@ostala.doucl.com>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=0.36, delays=0.18/0/0/0.18, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as A38F43C422AE)
Apr 21 09:41:01 ostala postfix/qmgr[1387]: 50B953C422E1: removed
Apr 21 09:41:01 ostala postfix/cleanup[1794]: A46943C422E4: message-id=<20170421144101.50B953C422E1@ostala.doucl.com>
Apr 21 09:41:01 ostala postfix/local[1431]: A38F43C422AE: to=<sogo@ostala.doucl.com>, relay=local, delay=0.1, delays=0/0/0/0.1, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (forwarded as A46943C422E4)
Apr 21 09:41:01 ostala postfix/qmgr[1387]: A46943C422E4: from=<sogo@ostala.doucl.com>, size=1572, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 21 09:41:01 ostala postfix/qmgr[1387]: A38F43C422AE: removed

dovecot.log

Apr 21 09:40:37 ostala dovecot: lda: Error: userdb lookup(postmaster@doucl.com): Connecting timed out
Apr 21 09:40:37 ostala dovecot: lda: Fatal: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information.
Apr 21 09:40:39 ostala dovecot: master: Warning: Killed with signal 15 (by pid=1 uid=0 code=kill)
Apr 21 09:40:39 ostala dovecot: config: Warning: Killed with signal 15 (by pid=1 uid=0 code=kill)
Apr 21 09:40:39 ostala dovecot: anvil: Warning: Killed with signal 15 (by pid=1 uid=0 code=kill)
Apr 21 09:40:39 ostala dovecot: log: Warning: Killed with signal 15 (by pid=1 uid=0 code=kill)
Apr 21 09:41:37 ostala dovecot: lda: Error: userdb lookup(postmaster@doucl.com): Connecting timed out
Apr 21 09:41:37 ostala dovecot: lda: Fatal: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information.
Apr 21 09:41:41 ostala dovecot: lda: Error: userdb lookup(user@doucl.com): Connecting timed out
Apr 21 09:41:41 ostala dovecot: lda: Fatal: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information.

telnet localhost 143

root@ostala:/etc/dovecot# telnet localhost 143
Trying ::1...
Connected to localhost.localdomain.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN] Dovecot ready.
. login user@doucl.com ************
* OK Waiting for authentication process to respond..

.login user@doucl.com ************
* OK Waiting for authentication process to respond..

dovecot-imap.log

Apr 21 09:11:30 ostala dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected: Inactivity during authentication (disconnected while authenticating, waited 170 secs): user=<>, method=PLAIN, rip=::1, lip=::1, secured, session=<kypqy61NjAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAB>
Apr 21 09:11:42 ostala dovecot: imap-login: Error: Timeout waiting for handshake from auth server. my pid=2217, input bytes=0
Apr 21 09:11:42 ostala dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected: Auth process broken (disconnected before auth was ready, waited 30 secs): user=<>, rip=::1, lip=::1, secured, session=<oxU71q1NCAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAB>
Apr 21 09:25:46 ostala dovecot: imap-login: Warning: Auth process not responding, delayed sending initial response (greeting): user=<>, rip=::1, lip=::1, secured, session=<4NiKCK5NkgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAB>
Apr 21 09:26:06 ostala dovecot: imap-login: Error: Timeout waiting for handshake from auth server. my pid=1440, input bytes=0
Apr 21 09:26:06 ostala dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected: Auth process broken (disconnected before auth was ready, waited 30 secs): user=<>, rip=::1, lip=::1, secured, session=<4NiKCK5NkgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAB>
Apr 21 09:33:13 ostala dovecot: imap-login: Error: Timeout waiting for handshake from auth server. my pid=1647, input bytes=0
Apr 21 09:33:13 ostala dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected: Auth process broken (disconnected before auth was ready, waited 30 secs): user=<>, rip=::1, lip=::1, secured, session=<S6QqI65NLgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAB>

↧

Re: Iredmail hooks / notifications on mail reception

April 21, 2017, 8:22 am
$
0
0
jackavin wrote:

Maybe quarantine all clean email to amavis database.
then use it to another program.

at /etc/amavis/conf.d/50-user

Re: Iredmail hooks / notifications on mail reception

Thanks for your reply but my problem is not how to retrieve incoming mails. It's about executing a shell script on mail receipt.
When I used Postfix hooks, Postfix was pointing to localhost when the call occurred. When I sent mails without hooks configuration, the postfix  is pointing to the external postgresql database.

What's wrong with the hooks ? Why are they looking  locally (local postgres database) instead of the external  postgresql ?

↧

Pipe incoming email

April 21, 2017, 11:24 am
$
0
0

==== Required information ====
- iRedMail version (check /etc/iredmail-release): 0.6.9
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version: Ubuntu
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL): PGSQL
- Web server (Apache or Nginx):None
- Manage mail accounts with iRedAdmin-Pro? No
- Related log if you're reporting an issue:
====

I'm trying to execute a shell script on email reception , i followed this tutorial http://www.iredmail.org/docs/pipe.incom … cript.html
it worked perfectly.

Now I want to use an external postgreSQL database so i deleted the local database and change postgresql configuration to use the new one (external database) but unfortunately it doesn't work, please find below the error in var/log/iredapd/iredapd.log  file:

2017-04-17 13:27:27 ERROR Unexpected error: (OperationalError) could not connect to server: Connection refused
        Is the server running on host "127.0.0.1" and accepting
        TCP/IP connections on port 5432?"

Can any one help me, i'm stuck thank you .

↧

Re: Problem with spam comming from servers without domain/unknown

April 21, 2017, 11:29 am
$
0
0

How can I block IP without DNS from sending mails to me?

↧
↧

Installation problem

April 21, 2017, 2:59 pm
$
0
0

iRedMail-0.9.6]# bash iRedMail.sh
CentOS 7
MariaDB
Apache

can't complete installation with error:
Error: php70w-common conflicts with php-common-5.4.16-42.el7.x86_64

↧

Re: Pipe incoming email

April 21, 2017, 3:01 pm
$
0
0

Looks like your remote server is not accepting connections. Check if you have a firewall blocking the connection, or if you have it just have it bound to local host instead of your public IP address. (That will be in your config file for the database)

↧
Search

Re: iredapd letting email be sent to alias islist when it should reject it

April 21, 2017, 3:03 pm
$
0
0

Is this the expected behaviour, or should it have blocked the email?

↧

Re: Removing Originial Sender IP from headers

April 22, 2017, 8:22 pm
$
0
0

Yes!!!! from point 2 to 6  of Neutro's answer worked for me in 2017

↧
↧

Re: postscreen and Haproxy

April 23, 2017, 3:28 am
$
0
0

it doesnt work for me.

i will explain to you what i need.
i have:
* 1 server of haproxy (gets imap,smtp,http,https connections)
* 2 servers of iredmail system (gets imap,smtp,https,http connections from haproxy)
* 1 servers of iredmail only for 587

i need haporxy to forward ip's to the 2 iredmail servers in port: 25,993,80,443

i have a problem only with smtp (25)

when i enable in main.cf file this option:
postscreen_upstream_proxy_protocol = haproxy
postscreen_upstream_proxy_timeout = 50s

the mails are being forward to postfix with the original ip.
the problem is, when im trying to send message from sogo im not allowed to connect to port 25 locally (127.0.0.1) anymore.
i did what you ask from me :"As a temporary solution, configure Postfix to listen on extra port (e.g. 10025), list your SOGo server in "-o mynetworks="."

and it seems that is works, but iredapd does not check the emails.
do i need to add something in master.cf for the iredapd check?
im stuck please help.

Thank you
Raz

↧

Shared mailboxes not working in SOGo

April 23, 2017, 11:38 am
$
0
0

======== Required information ====
- iRedMail version (check /etc/iredmail-release): 0.9.6 OPENLDAP edition
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version: Debian 8 Jessie
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL): LDAP
- Web server (Apache or Nginx): Nginx
- Manage mail accounts with iRedAdmin-Pro? no
- Related log if you're reporting an issue: ??
====

Hello,

I just installed the current version of iRedMail on my server and configured some user accounts. Now I want to share my inbox from user1@example.com with user2@example.com. I used the ACL manager to configure permissions for user2 in SOGo.

When I login with user2, I see a folder called "Other users", but when I click on it, it gives me an error: "An error occured while communicating with the mail server." From the SOGo log files I got this line:

[NGImap4Connection]> could not select URL: imap://user1%40example.com@127.0.0.1/Shared/: {RawResponse = "{ResponseResult = {description = \"Mailbox doesn't exist: Shared\"; result = no; tagId = 6; }; }"; reason = "Mailbox doesn't exist: Shared"; result = 0; }

I the logged in at RoundCubeMail with user2 and went to the IMAP subscription settings. I was able to subscribe to the user1@example.com folder (subfolder of Shared).

I already changed the SOGo setting "Show subscribed mailboxes only" to true and in the subscribe dialog I saw the other users mailbox...

Can someone figure out whats wrong? As I said, its a fresh installation which I deployed a few hours ago...

Best regards,

seschi

↧

Forward group e-mail ends up in spam

April 24, 2017, 4:53 am
$
0
0

============ Required information ====
- iRedMail version (check /etc/iredmail-release): 0.9.6
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL): MySQL
- Web server (Apache or Nginx): Nginx
- Related log if you're reporting an issue: see below
====

When I create a group with e-mail forwards, all e-mail arrives normally...except Outlook puts all of it in the spam folder. It seems to pass SPF, DKIM, DMARC checks but still ends up in spam. PTR and records are checked, not listed at any blocklist and MXtoolbox mailserver check gives all green at every check. Does anyone have a clue why Outlook put those e-mails in spam?

Here is the header of a test mail:

Received: from DB5EUR03HT124.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com
 (10.165.230.41) by VI1PR08MB1182.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com with HTTPS via
 VI1PR10CA0031.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:22:05 +0000
Received: from DB5EUR03FT022.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com
 (10.152.20.57) by DB5EUR03HT124.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com
 (10.152.20.252) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.1019.14; Mon, 24
 Apr 2017 11:22:04 +0000
Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 180.180.100.100)
 smtp.mailfrom=mymaildomain.com; outlook.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified)
 header.d=senderdomain-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com;outlook.com; dmarc=none
 action=none header.from=senderdomain.com;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of mymaildomain.com designates
 180.180.100.100as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=180.180.100.100; helo= mx.mymaildomain.com;
Received: from COL004-MC1F24.hotmail.com (10.152.20.60) by
 DB5EUR03FT022.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.20.171) with Microsoft SMTP
 Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id
 15.1.1047.9 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:22:03 +0000
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:7826DBB6BC560E77E351B29685EBBBE44B1E4392C9AE045E5B3267040B6498A8;UpperCasedChecksum:BA51A2BE64C8DED04835A279D276F337BE62AA1FC77F45DE883CB39484E55FF5;SizeAsReceived:3456;Count:23
Received: from mx.mymaildomain.com ([180.180.100.100]) by COL004-MC1F24.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23143);
     Mon, 24 Apr 2017 04:22:02 -0700
Received: from mx.mymaildomain.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
    by mx.mymaildomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0906056E
    for <mikester01@outlook.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:22:00 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mymaildomain.com
Authentication-Results: mx.mymaildomain.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
    header.d=senderdomain-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mx.mymaildomain.com ([127.0.0.1])
    by mx.mymaildomain.com (mx.mymaildomain.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
    with ESMTP id k4Ng1TElHc6w for <mikester01@outlook.com>;
    Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:22:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243])
    by mx.mymaildomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CBB7604DD
    for <team@groupemail.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:21:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id z129so16488600wmb.1
        for <team@groupemail.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 04:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=senderdomain-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id
         :to;
        bh=6ErXpecY77wokjls71KhkZoevapcLku94hWioklkaVk=;
        b=czVKSzXAletSl1bs3XtZ7gc2kCGlf3o9YwDl8BHGt0nWu4uonyHKsgaaAec0xXZbjH
         gEqDV7Cuz9rONv81dE+NOGLn1j7wdag5D4cYh5bWPev6vl1Zkb91tp9Nb4aH5lrzv6GU
         rcT57kfFcz7sG5xOCAd0Yy1mwC3soOmGYEks7Dj/OX1BzeCjrf9PnpufLlIjo4CV2Xex
         lCqRzHA/mg/5t4HYxTDZKfv4TOxqu3ETF7SSVG0aGobQr4YXjTpjhIW5pQr9DjB/TZBV
         eIsdlMxpN9GM+34xPzJ0MozAQA8WC9UmMjdbkBcnIMwrJpzgki5IQXDuiHSKxJyKrpLF
         7M5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date
         :subject:message-id:to;
        bh=6ErXpecY77wokjls71KhkZoevapcLku94hWioklkaVk=;
        b=Mzzkz8mlcyVr/gYge0HHbVeHkHtQ+6+6Ww7XWY1PhvjoMcVPR4h5Cluyz1ntNTTFen
         Denze2VcSOPL4FdWN0g7HCKhLHmmbJnv0jfVHRPNZV1cJxRr2wqWbC3YUwGKrVCxlXL8
         mLuY2vHbPlIIGUVCk1gZgcy0zIzfsXFMyYHZLtT1lX4F6McOpqPuTp9ZlbUf7qj/x958
         ZLPRpoGRByUoqGzz2g7GzWBM1z1eE0zzTiv1yobZPrv2zQhUR8b2y2tpeFe+4oGjJrTs
         zhgiLuXi5d6ZuXskEsqC74ZF8y0g4HAdmsaJnuSRhQLDmLzPLlnf2xXxv+VltQmmsFzQ
         aBFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7HJCOjH+wxBg1oal5zpG6vS6BNjE+ZDNOorW2Xt4NyrawqeOeT
    1D7FCpND++8EweWlWVI=
X-Received: by 10.80.184.2 with SMTP id j2mr664960ede.176.1493032912532;
        Mon, 24 Apr 2017 04:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.7.165] ([213.206.222.106])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a56sm3693398edd.48.2017.04.24.04.21.51
        for <team@groupemail.com>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Mon, 24 Apr 2017 04:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: John <info@senderdomain.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:21:51 +0200
Subject: Test monday
Message-Id: <6680CC8E-095B-42DF-8CC5-046E8936FE48@senderdomain.com>
To: team@groupemail.com
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14E304)
Return-Path: srs0=r95q=4a=senderdomain.com=info@mymaildomain.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2017 11:22:02.0365 (UTC) FILETIME=[FEFFDAD0:01D2BCEC]
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 23
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: b8fe84fa-e36e-49bc-6aed-08d48b0422a0
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-EOPTenantAttributedMessage: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa:0
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-MessageDirectionality: Incoming
CMM-sender-ip: 180.180.100.100
CMM-sending-ip: 180.180.100.100
CMM-Authentication-Results: hotmail.com; spf=pass (sender IP is
 180.180.100.100) smtp.mailfrom=srs0=r95q=4a=senderdomain.com=info@mymaildomain.com;
 dkim=none header.d=senderdomain.com; x-hmca=none header.id=info@senderdomain.com
CMM-X-SID-PRA: info@senderdomain.com
CMM-X-AUTH-Result: NONE
CMM-X-SID-Result: NONE
CMM-X-Message-Status: n:n
CMM-X-Message-Delivery: Vj0xLjE7dXM9MDtsPTA7YT0wO0Q9MjtHRD0yO1NDTD00
CMM-X-Message-Info: 11chDOWqoTlZdH4WCntP4ccRkujknwUs0TXNr4EGkA5lHUfDewx0jApNKaECP+Ht8gI+nI0mBB0cvbLQz3itZWriCMTbtCrVpBVaphvJiELLFJl6aDUcg/MjsgIBVH94AOwWqoIl2NcwJfDUCyfLa23XAhgqXFu24OLVHYdxSanZy0/d5JLT9kPMZK+FCa0RwvwUNkE6j+0eAU09BqlPzz2jpA8gR9k4ssfw/P4NGvvzWRnnjMS2G99zGhw33uky
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: 5
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PCL: 2
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;DB5EUR03FT022;1:Yz1xEz8w3/Wllg43By0T/VaZnUAyXRVuCpOMmdGk6UUrPg70wdk+ILEAsx6jkYZKbjq/sozZRbL49kdTMXgf5XHXFVS4a/aQqrF8JuS3wuT9L/LJmGzqbndapPFvGveuJ4vk4Y4D4CKrpsGoMDlDXalTtl+Lt92NAQFevr/yd7/tqEcHRvbDHoatc5W1UrRO
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: EFV:NLI;SFV:SPM;SFS:(28900001);DIR:INB;SFP:;SCL:5;SRVR:DB5EUR03HT124;H:COL004-MC1F24.hotmail.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en;
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: DB5EUR03FT022.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: b8fe84fa-e36e-49bc-6aed-08d48b0422a0
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001)(8291500097)(8291501071);SRVR:DB5EUR03HT124;
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;DB5EUR03HT124;3:QbGFFZrN3A/wYCH7x3WtYdQf93v3zuGVW/TWUoHEf0lw1dkKpw2VuyKUOno79BdlILHjbO2rza5+NPROc/+8YVDOv0gmTDQ4qBqzMETHlTh+QQFi5Va2JrY0CXGTTWTicSRSU2Ql87bp1lr2i0pancw5WPPTh0waG2wsDJYShk6Ys7HTCNbQX0BUJTjBekEUI8sI2vfStTp1X/PMGcasjv2dDnH1BaAngElFgKYtbfiV/fcnbzxZ5zAvdBISuMogUJDxcd1AChrWtpUGUkNNgf/uSfES2dRaQanxTrR8LBV+BB2UCY4OKi7gd9YIchWLDeZNF8JvpwOkjL2qW0dDV0iRCS5dYSwK7px1nrTR50v/kT4LbLoJPsBX0ZXwUI7/7d5UTlbVBiSG0sXacOMj+g==;25: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
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AVStamp-Service: 1.0
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;DB5EUR03HT124;31:UNilWihaE50SF2I3zOJe3QcdEuYV82AyVNegaHnPsezienMyoBUNbleCmX6rc5Q4qMARI8b16Us2sQp7toCNplwbh1MiNa+MFgX2BrAxtzbuBwb40TLFLc4wuIBYlSnKqj8Qss/NFK/X8ixPbM1XG7yt6qXD+DVwPQmxucoboVXEREyl0qf4X+HD+jhNu/hb6Wu+E7oAglYI3I8hdiupKQCsCJhElo14ZGcdZ+sjF4rATqTgbtGkLDZxogTvn61nfxbaa0n/h1pq+IFK/pLMlovELEdw1oTCHGl/SpQy0RPqpB2A2hls/IPSdTUSq2ro;4:UkRhUTE2HhpV2j4ZUqqMTiZE/e9ZgY/C9lwChi4JBOdtGk5s+FCLY4QeaE1gEEeTBi6EL6w31z+3mEIV53izG8OJzmmBnlnzXpwmeEKC1J5OlRzetAmbadcAmR5hBiO0O9UpbW5dTEQRUVm7QigvJAE7V2XUe8yqtHlIkoGVpStVj86DBbQHdT2liCiFzP9FFxnt0hLKmyz4j0lw9Iiw7uwHtZXEjIBruJ1ltqNzK+dTRE/0M223No3kdPU7Gf0+k9OpqYP2RHq+s0JY/axo1zEagbfOZ91XdA5uXZMol94=;23:fFQZvrjVH4EcWaV5wRjcB7cI8ggCLtDvF6D6B5GyV/mpPrxLtCtnhIgdD9I+St9FSGNs4eY3vPA3H4/pwtqhqypLLiaUcbz+lClsbgPuO7R+DXssB/SiTZ6dA/R77FyiuH8gcsj2EC/4ePRsH0qseAgP5DeUqltZ2wkdo1vgfNllk69XCUSmrgWKH13ggR8ixabUJPnh5kBFXL7tVRarMg==
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(444000031);SRVR:DB5EUR03HT124;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB5EUR03HT124;
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;DB5EUR03HT124;6:xXoImLTrgtptSTumufHCbWkzG984SDN6o/emx4ERooB9Cg3YSPg852kpMLmIOb3HJDBRTAnEClX0ylJU9Ny8k0IomkX9tN9t0zu9E+vMj3l80+Qp51cd8cwnbVgCfTzCLL3EzP88jdmdSU3l7apgY5NiAHobzWiiNigj9LQa9IGgwKmk1Zwebj0nzf7CddCe7LIzYCJUa86VoiuFhJKluqFthUXj2FTlgrdB6Y8gkH70/yRC2Mpo/8fdCaBHSFR6jqszznb/uXOcEpi34Z1+FNlsaW3NUrrYMDoYWdtLvlI4Wt655CIdx92Xobp3Uz+S7GribEq31WL2y0Q0OhI78E/5Oce7+Q1db0RRDPvFwPgAluMyAK0GP/5+8ejUT3K2dVitUDDoOZ7jRhuJPCDlmQ==;5:AnoccQJr0XRPdQkVBN+n66oBGcW48swhlJFJG5vmT26MGmFOgsv39PiwU0kcCU0trIv47HZ/bEZrthIuMeGsEHh2gVqelydSaItTsfqkyddDwOeS7fC9PAAKshBFtn2eIZ2papTiGEEVMpqjhFDPyg==;24:Una2gzv2QlKK+ckmsBlT10Q6UjjjofOcJZc2wdYixp31M0g+HBmSZcULHtkH3WNg6lttNyRl43yUrJuSFE/xXA==
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:22
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: Default
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;DB5EUR03HT124;7:weZ54IiOORIyMeY684WSuN1uCl9nNAyTXxxBZcyHDhmiQslx54JxPqYrsagJHOJq/kc5Q09FRf/v9FPyCXqnVMShE5gYLck+q8Vh/sJDWTeKYYPYf4ajKJk+u/7UwuIEEMoSR3qpF/3Zxj8k2TWvi1RoPL2C6QRbEysvC7RqMxwOMTJVzmy1tQM6qDTrF5sOPedMbv5UDZ7wi72VI3X60fYZ7nr7c4MDsZ5u5cAZGVTN3dedwJzB0mhrm7G0YyXJq+J4er8snAHjWcDhKNFgVUSgReO3hUENvWrkT0t7E0sMQOVrqxlIWre3Ui5g3CDjblWa10XnG3cSdd1fi6zeug==
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2017 11:22:03.5338
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5EUR03HT124
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-EndToEndLatency: 00:00:01.9886225
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
    1;VI1PR08MB1182;27:AQWxtxiYav7mCHr384MqNqEkW0lUDzh8enY5YutWPlkdqgN3HJ4n8gyZwtsSJ6IDb5vfdLhf313IQgH2ATrlfL0mcV7KT2vUEqey8//JGYFzzROUPbYs8mY4oN4eYIMtRrhdOvK42PN0fqd1ts5cfg==
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
    abwl:0;wl:0;pcwl:0;kl:0;iwl:0;ijl:0;dwl:0;dkl:0;rwl:0;ex:0;psp:0;auth:0;dest:J;WIMS-SenderIP:180.180.100.100;WIMS-SPF:mymaildomain%2ecom;WIMS-DKIM:senderdomain%2ecom;WIMS-822:info%40senderdomain%2ecom;WIMS-PRA:info%40senderdomain%2ecom;WIMS-AUTH:NONE;ENG:(5061607094)(102400140)(102420017);RF:JunkEmail;OFR:SpamFilterAuthJ;
MIME-Version: 1.0

Monday test mail

This is what the log records:

Apr 24 13:22:00 mx postfix/smtp-amavis/smtp[2860]: 6CBB7604DD: to=<mikester01@outlook.com>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=1, delays=0.11/0.45/0.07/0.39, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 5B0906056E)
Apr 24 13:22:01 mx postfix/smtp[2867]: Untrusted TLS connection established to mx4.hotmail.com[65.55.37.72]:25: TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)
Apr 24 13:22:02 mx postfix/smtp[2867]: 5B0906056E: to=<mikester01@outlook.com>, relay=mx4.hotmail.com[65.55.37.72]:25, delay=2, delays=0/0.01/1.4/0.67, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250  <6680CC8E-095B-42DF-8CC5-046E8936FE48@senderdomain.com> Queued mail for delivery)
↧
Viewing all 43471 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>