Why this is not spam?

April 16, 2017, 11:35 am

≪ Previous: SOGo Sync Issue: Table sogo.sogo_cache_folder doesn't exist

==== Required information ====
- iRedMail version (check /etc/iredmail-release): 0.9.6
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version: Linux Debian
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL): SQL
- Web server (Apache or Nginx): Apache
- Manage mail accounts with iRedAdmin-Pro? No
- Related log if you're reporting an issue:
====

Hi guys, i want to ask, why this mail is not being quarentined? couse SPAM score is 7.xx and spamassassin required_score is 5. The mail was rewrited to [SPAM] but delivered as clean.

by mail.materiaoscura.net (Dovecot) with LMTP id 4x6sOqME8lgtGQAAzeB/DQ
for <fran@x.es>; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:31:48 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.materiaoscura.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB280881D9
for <fran@x.es>; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 13:31:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.materiaoscura.net
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 7.33
X-Spam-Level: *******
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.33 tagged_above=-999 required=6
tests=[DCC_CHECK=5, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
DKIM_VERIFIED=-1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001,
HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02=0.805,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.635, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.105,
MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI=0.001, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.724, PLING_QUERY=0.279,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no

↧

Re: SOGo update

April 16, 2017, 12:26 pm

≫ Next: Re: Why this is not spam?

≪ Previous: Why this is not spam?

I experienced this same problem. Fixed with a cron edit for the sogo usr

run:
crontab -e -u sogo

edit:
* * * * * /usr/sbin/sogo-tool expire-sessions 30 2>/dev/null; /usr/sbin/sogo-ealarms-notify 2> /dev/null

↧

Re: Why this is not spam?

April 16, 2017, 4:52 pm

≫ Next: Re: 502 Bad Gateway: connect() to unix:/var/run/php-fpm.socket failed

≪ Previous: Re: SOGo update

To quarantine detected spam/virus/bad-header/banned, follow this tutorial please:
http://www.iredmail.org/docs/quarantining.html

↧

Re: 502 Bad Gateway: connect() to unix:/var/run/php-fpm.socket failed

April 16, 2017, 4:54 pm

≫ Next: Re: SOGo Sync Issue: Table sogo.sogo_cache_folder doesn't exist

≪ Previous: Re: Why this is not spam?

schnappi wrote:

upstream: "fastcgi://unix:/var/run/php-fpm.socket:"

You have "listen = /run/php/php7.0-fpm.sock" in php-fpm config file, but Nginx is looking for /var/run/php-fpm.socket.

↧

Re: SOGo Sync Issue: Table sogo.sogo_cache_folder doesn't exist

April 16, 2017, 4:57 pm

≫ Next: Re: block incoming email on servers hostname

≪ Previous: Re: 502 Bad Gateway: connect() to unix:/var/run/php-fpm.socket failed

If you don't have any important data in SOGo yet, try this:

- Stop sogo service.
- Drop sogo sql db
- Create it again without specified character set: "CREATE DATABASE sogo;"
- Restart sogo.

iRedMail uses "UTF8" by default, but CentOS 6 ships MySQL 5.1 which is old and doesn't support long index key length (required by SOGo sql template).

CentOS 7 ships newer MariaDB and no problem with standard iRedMail installation.

↧

Re: block incoming email on servers hostname

April 16, 2017, 5:00 pm

≫ Next: Re: 502 Bad Gateway: connect() to unix:/var/run/php-fpm.socket failed

≪ Previous: Re: SOGo Sync Issue: Table sogo.sogo_cache_folder doesn't exist

Hard to help troubleshoot without (FULL) log related to this email in Postfix and iRedAPD log file.

↧

Re: 502 Bad Gateway: connect() to unix:/var/run/php-fpm.socket failed

April 16, 2017, 5:47 pm

≫ Next: Re: SOGo Sync Issue: Table sogo.sogo_cache_folder doesn't exist

≪ Previous: Re: block incoming email on servers hostname

Thanks. Resolved.
/etc/php/7.0/fpm/pool.d/www.conf
must have been updated to new version during package update without a prompt.

↧

Re: SOGo Sync Issue: Table sogo.sogo_cache_folder doesn't exist

April 16, 2017, 5:55 pm

≫ Next: Re: Blocking "EHLO ylmf-pc" connection attempts

≪ Previous: Re: 502 Bad Gateway: connect() to unix:/var/run/php-fpm.socket failed

That worked like a charm. Thank you Zhang!

↧

Re: Blocking "EHLO ylmf-pc" connection attempts

April 16, 2017, 6:22 pm

≫ Next: Re: Log Postfix and Spamassassin

≪ Previous: Re: SOGo Sync Issue: Table sogo.sogo_cache_folder doesn't exist

Thanks for this. I am familiar with fail2ban on Linux but this is the first time I have installed it on FreeBSD, using the py-fail2ban port.

After installing that port, putting your file in the filter.d directory, and starting the fail2ban daemon, the mail server logged 61 more ylmf connection attempts from the same IP address in less than 10 minutes. There is no indication of blocking (or of a problem) in the fail2ban log. Is any other configuration required?

Thanks again.

↧

Re: Log Postfix and Spamassassin

April 16, 2017, 10:52 pm

≫ Next: Re: block incoming email on servers hostname

≪ Previous: Re: Blocking "EHLO ylmf-pc" connection attempts

Hi,

I re-open this post with some doubts.

I enabled SQL in bayes, connection is fine and I see a lot of entry, but I dont't know if really spamassassin its filtering emails because some users are receiving emails without mark "SPAM" and they clearly are spam. Score is 2 (for example) and limit are 4.31. All email are same value ~ and none is marked as SPAM.

How could I check if Spamassassin its working?

I was checking some files:

local.cf (spamassassin)
required_score 5.0
rewrite_header subject [ SPAM ]
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_auto_expire 1

Here one header with score -9999

X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.xxxx.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.998 tagged_above=-999 required=4.31
    tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
    autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no

Here another code

Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: rules: running head tests; score so far=-0.997
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: rules: running body tests; score so far=-0.997
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: rules: running uri tests; score so far=-0.997
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: rules: running body_eval tests; score so far=-0.997
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: rules: running rawbody tests; score so far=-0.997
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: rules: running full tests; score so far=-0.997
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: rules: running meta tests; score so far=-0.997
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AutoLearnThreshold=HASH(0x5ea9ac8) implements 'autolearn_discriminator', priority 0
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn: currently using scoreset 1
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn: adding head_only points 0.001
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn: adding head_only points 0.001
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn: adding head_only points -0.001
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn: adding body_only points 0.001
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn: message score: -0.997, computed score for autolearn: 0.002
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn? ham=0.1, spam=12, body-points=0.001, head-points=0.001, learned-points=0
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: learn: auto-learn? yes, ham (0.002 < 0.1) autolearn_force=no
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: learn: initializing learner
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: learn: learning ham
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: check: pms new, time limit in 297.213 s
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WLBLEval=HASH(0x5eba470) implements 'check_wb_list', priority 0
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: eval: all '*From' addrs: from@domain.com
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: eval: all '*To' addrs: to@domain.com
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Bayes=HASH(0x5eaf838) implements 'learn_message', priority 0
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: check: pms new, time limit in 297.212 s
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: bayes: database connection established
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 3
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: bayes: Using userid: 1
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: bayes: seen (3b4d15f9851e6f349b70c0e83b787a82fe898c04@sa_generated) put
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: bayes: learned '3b4d15f9851e6f349b70c0e83b787a82fe898c04@sa_generated', atime: 1492408240
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: learn: initializing learner
Apr 17 07:50:50 mail amavis[18647]: (18647-01) SA dbg: check: is spam? score=-0.997 required=5

Note: I enabled SQL 3 days ago, maybe should I wait to autolearn more time?

thanks.

↧

Re: block incoming email on servers hostname

April 17, 2017, 1:07 am

≫ Next: Issue on sending emails

≪ Previous: Re: Log Postfix and Spamassassin

Apologies please see log files

iRedAPD log file.

2017-04-15 10:54:12 INFO [104.47.6.248] Client is whitelisted for greylisting service: (id=187620, sender=104.47.0.0/17, comment="AUTO-UPDATE: ebay.com")
2017-04-15 10:54:12 INFO 104.47.6.248 RCPT, -> ben@domain.com, DUNNO [0.0429s]
2017-04-15 10:54:12 INFO 104.47.6.248 END-OF-MESSAGE, -> ben@domain.com, DUNNO [0.0040s]

If my interpretation is correct, the mail server has been used before (by mail from ebay) and therfore whitelisted. No policy shown about the From: address.

I wonder if it was sent without a FQDN as the From: which is why it just appended mx.domain.com to it? Although loking at main.cf that should be rejected by reject_non_fqdn_sender

# Sender restrictions
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
reject_unknown_sender_domain
reject_non_fqdn_sender
reject_unlisted_sender
permit_mynetworks
permit_sasl_authenticated
check_sender_access pcre:/etc/postfix/sender_access.pcre

mail.log

Apr 15 10:54:12 mx postfix/smtpd[10352]: 51EB55DCBF: client=mail-ve1eur02hn0248.outbound.protection.outlook.com[104.47.6.248]
Apr 15 10:54:12 mx postfix/cleanup[10585]: 51EB55DCBF: message-id=<37bd2177-6fc1-448a-a528-94bf686f1451@P2KITHUB08W.unicph.domain>
Apr 15 10:54:12 mx postfix/qmgr[1719]: 51EB55DCBF: from=<>, size=174031, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 15 10:54:12 mx postfix/smtpd[10352]: disconnect from mail-ve1eur02hn0248.outbound.protection.outlook.com[104.47.6.248] ehlo=2 starttls=1 mail=1 rcpt=1 data=1 quit=1 commands=7
Apr 15 10:59:44 mx postfix/10025/smtpd[10695]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
Apr 15 10:59:44 mx postfix/10025/smtpd[10695]: 976055DC02: client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
Apr 15 10:59:44 mx postfix/10025/smtpd[10695]: disconnect from localhost[127.0.0.1] ehlo=1 mail=1 rcpt=1 data=1 quit=1 commands=5
Apr 15 10:59:44 mx postfix/smtp-amavis/smtp[10588]: 51EB55DCBF: to=<ben@domain.com>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=342, delays=9.5/0.03/0.04/332, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 976055DC02)
Apr 15 10:59:44 mx postfix/pipe[10698]: 976055DC02: to=<ben@domain.com>, relay=dovecot, delay=0.29, delays=0.15/0.03/0/0.1, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via dovecot service)
Apr 15 10:59:44 mx postfix/qmgr[1719]: 976055DC02: removed

There is a quite a gap where the email is being scanned, thats because clamav was having problems with a corrupted database file by the looks of syslog, and restarted.

Regards

Ben

↧

Issue on sending emails

April 17, 2017, 1:12 am

≫ Next: Re: Iredmail hooks / notifications on mail reception

≪ Previous: Re: block incoming email on servers hostname

iRedMail Version: 0.9.5
Linux: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, Kernel 4.9
MySQL
Nginx
Not managing with iRedAdmin-Pro.

Description:
All iRedMail elements used to work properly on my server. However, I found that it cannot send emails recently while it still can receiving.

I use IMAP and SMTP clients to manage my emails. No matter what I send, the emails just keep staying in "outbox" folder, not in "sent". I tried different clients, and I can eliminate failure on my own networking.

Since receiving function still work, here's some log when iRedMail receiving emails. When sending, no new logs was generated on iredapd.log. Email addresses are replaced with asterisks.

----
2017-04-17 15:42:20 INFO [183.60.2.42] Client has not been seen before, greylisted.
2017-04-17 15:42:20 INFO [183.60.2.42] RCPT, *********@qq.com -> me@**********.com, 451 4.7.1 Intentional policy rejection, please try again later
2017-04-17 15:43:23 INFO [183.60.2.42] Client retries too soon, greylisted again.
2017-04-17 15:43:23 INFO [183.60.2.42] RCPT, *********@qq.com -> me@**********.com, 451 4.7.1 Intentional policy rejection, please try again later
2017-04-17 15:45:25 INFO [183.60.2.42] Client retries too soon, greylisted again.
2017-04-17 15:45:25 INFO [183.60.2.42] RCPT, *********@qq.com -> me@**********.com, 451 4.7.1 Intentional policy rejection, please try again later
2017-04-17 15:49:39 INFO [183.60.2.42] Client retries too soon, greylisted again.
2017-04-17 15:49:39 INFO [183.60.2.42] RCPT, *********@qq.com -> me@**********.com, 451 4.7.1 Intentional policy rejection, please try again later
2017-04-17 15:57:49 INFO [183.60.2.42] Client has passed the greylisting, accept this email.
2017-04-17 15:57:49 INFO [183.60.2.42] RCPT, *********@qq.com -> me@**********.com, DUNNO
2017-04-17 15:57:49 INFO [183.60.2.42] END-OF-MESSAGE, *********@qq.com -> me@**********.com, DUNNO
----

I recently deleted all Nginx configuration files about iRedAdmin, for it is kind of annoying and I no longer need it. I don't know if that has an influence on this issue.

I'd like to provide more information to help troubleshooting if needed.

↧

Re: Iredmail hooks / notifications on mail reception

April 17, 2017, 1:57 am

≫ Next: Re: Why this is not spam?

≪ Previous: Issue on sending emails

When I followed the tutorial you sent to me earlier and tried to send an email, it said : "Is there any server running on port 5432 on host 127.0.0.1 ?" . When I start the local postgresql service (on Iredmail Docker container), it said 'FATAL: password authentication failed for user "vmail" '.

P.S: The Postgresql containing all mailing data (iredapd,vmail,amavisd) is located on an isolated container. I am running iredmail on another container as well. Why is it looking locally for the database when using the hooks ??

When I tried to shutdown local postgres (installed on the iredmail container), it said (on /var/log/iredapd/iredapd.log):
"2017-04-17 13:27:27 ERROR Unexpected error: (OperationalError) could not connect to server: Connection refused
Is the server running on host "127.0.0.1" and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5432?"

Please advise.

↧

Re: Why this is not spam?

April 17, 2017, 4:33 am

≫ Next: Re: I think my mail server is sending spam

≪ Previous: Re: Iredmail hooks / notifications on mail reception

ZhangHuangbin wrote:

To quarantine detected spam/virus/bad-header/banned, follow this tutorial please:
http://www.iredmail.org/docs/quarantining.html

All this is done. Some spam mails are quaratined ok, and some others only has header rewrited.
But i think where the problem is. I am using amacube plugin in roundcube. And this plugin is adding data to amavisd database policy table, And is changing spam_kill_level spam_tag_level, etc values.

↧

Re: I think my mail server is sending spam

April 17, 2017, 4:37 am

≫ Next: TLS SUPPORT : Your server's response did not include "250-STARTTLS" in

≪ Previous: Re: Why this is not spam?

Spam sending has stopped.
Should I try to fix amavis or just leave it?
Not sure what to look for in the config files to troubleshoot the problem.
Can I just reinstall the whole system to the latest release?
Thanks

↧

TLS SUPPORT : Your server's response did not include "250-STARTTLS" in

April 17, 2017, 10:07 am

≫ Next: Email aliases / mail lists

≪ Previous: Re: I think my mail server is sending spam

======== Required information ====
- iRedMail version (check /etc/iredmail-release): 0.9.6
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version: Ubuntu 16.04LTS
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL): MySQL
- Web server (Apache or Nginx):NIGINX
- Manage mail accounts with iRedAdmin-Pro?Yes
- Related log if you're reporting an issue:
====

Recently I noticed some issues in my log file:

Apr 17 18:01:56 mx postfix/anvil[31661]: statistics: max connection rate 1/60s for (smtpd:103.28.42.100) at Apr 17 17:58:35
Apr 17 18:01:56 mx postfix/anvil[31661]: statistics: max connection count 1 for (smtpd:103.28.42.100) at Apr 17 17:58:35
Apr 17 18:01:56 mx postfix/anvil[31661]: statistics: max cache size 1 at Apr 17 17:58:35
Apr 17 18:11:22 mx postfix/qmgr[1755]: 18ACE5E0AD8: from=<**********>, size=7515, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 17 18:11:23 mx postfix/smtp[31836]: 18ACE5E0AD8: enabling PIX workarounds: disable_esmtp delay_dotcrlf for mail.ctrack.com[207.46.163.106]:25
Apr 17 18:11:23 mx postfix/smtp[31836]: 18ACE5E0AD8: host mail.ctrack.com[207.46.163.106] said: 454 4.7.0 Connection is not TLS encrypted. Recipient organization requires TLS. [SN1NAM01FT003.eop-nam01.prod.protection.outlook.com] (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Apr 17 18:11:29 mx postfix/smtp[31836]: 18ACE5E0AD8: enabling PIX workarounds: disable_esmtp delay_dotcrlf for mail.ctrack.com[216.32.180.170]:25
Apr 17 18:11:29 mx postfix/smtp[31836]: 18ACE5E0AD8: to=<*****@ctrack.com>, relay=mail.ctrack.com[216.32.180.170]:25, delay=433145, delays=433138/0.02/7.1/0.18, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (host mail.ctrack.com[216.32.180.170] said: 454 4.7.0 Connection is not TLS encrypted. Recipient organization requires TLS. [BN3NAM01FT064.eop-nam01.prod.protection.outlook.com] (in reply to RCPT TO command))

The mail is then returned to my mail user.

The other mail domain (ctrack.com) is being hosted by Microsoft.

When I do a mail server check on my own mail server using the mxtoolbox.com web site, it reports that my server does not support STARTTLS. This is their explanation of the error:

Your SMTP email server does advertise support for TLS. After connecting to your mail server we issue an EHLO command to introduce ourselves and to request that your server announce which commands and protocols it supports. Your server's response did not include "250-STARTTLS" indicating TLS support.

I have checked in the main.cf config file of my Postfix, and I have

smtp_tls_security_level = may

What is the problem?

How do I fix this?

Regards

↧

Email aliases / mail lists

April 17, 2017, 10:40 am

≫ Next: Re: user profile change logs...

≪ Previous: TLS SUPPORT : Your server's response did not include "250-STARTTLS" in

==== Required information ====
- iRedMail version (check /etc/iredmail-release): 0.9.6 OPENLDAP edition.
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version: CentOS release 6.9 (Final)
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL): LDAP
- Web server (Apache or Nginx): Apache 2.2.15
- Manage mail accounts with iRedAdmin-Pro? NO
- Related log if you're reporting an issue:
====

On our old server (CentOS 6.9 with OpenWebMail) I created mail lists for my users by adding an alias to /etc/aliases as follows:

maillist1: :include:/var/lib/samba/maillists/maillist1.txt

This allowed the no-so-technical users to add/update the mail lists via SAMBA and was a pretty elegant solution.

With iRedmail I am finding non-existent email addresses are rejected before they get to postfix for delivery. I've tried editing/adding a Global Address Book using phpldapadmin but it is not working according the the documentation at http://www.iredmail.org/docs/ldap.add.mail.list.html. Also, adding 112 email addresses that way is tedious and prone to error.

Is there a batch method for setting up Global Address Books or, even better, a way to allow users to email aliases defined in a text file such as my example above?

↧

Re: user profile change logs...

April 17, 2017, 11:46 pm

≫ Next: Re: postscreen and Haproxy

≪ Previous: Email aliases / mail lists

Thank you for the answer. I hope that this bug will be solved soon.

↧

Re: postscreen and Haproxy

April 18, 2017, 12:29 am

≫ Next: migrate form postfix

≪ Previous: Re: user profile change logs...

Hey zhang,
i thought when web mail communicate with postfix in 127.0.0.1 it uses port 25
but still..i cannot communicate from webmail to postfix.

when this option enabled (postscreen_upstream_proxy_protocol = haproxy) in main.cf
you dont see any connection in mail.log (only from haproxy)
but when its disabled:

Apr 18 10:22:44 my postfix/postscreen[14593]: CONNECT from [127.0.0.1]:53472 to [127.0.0.1]:25
Apr 18 10:22:44 my postfix/postscreen[14593]: WHITELISTED [127.0.0.1]:53472
Apr 18 10:22:44 my postfix/smtpd[14594]: connect from my.server.email[127.0.0.1]
Apr 18 10:22:45 my postfix/smtpd[14594]: 0151F5FE20: client=my.server.email[127.0.0.1]
Apr 18 10:22:45 my postfix/cleanup[14597]: 0151F5FE20: message-id=<37be-58f5bf00-1-8c43540@107650857>
Apr 18 10:22:45 my postfix/qmgr[14580]: 0151F5FE20: from=<raz@test.com>, size=972, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 18 10:22:45 my postfix/smtpd[14594]: disconnect from my.server.email[127.0.0.1] ehlo=1 mail=1 rcpt=1 data=1 quit=1 commands=5
Apr 18 10:22:45 my postfix/smtpd[14603]: connect from my.server.email[127.0.0.1]
Apr 18 10:22:45 my postfix/smtpd[14603]: ADB22605B4: client=my.server.email[127.0.0.1]
Apr 18 10:22:45 my postfix/cleanup[14597]: ADB22605B4: message-id=<37be-58f5bf00-1-8c43540@107650857>
Apr 18 10:22:45 my postfix/smtpd[14603]: disconnect from my.server.email[127.0.0.1] ehlo=1 mail=1 rcpt=1 data=1 quit=1 commands=5
Apr 18 10:22:45 my postfix/qmgr[14580]: ADB22605B4: from=<raz@local.com>, size=1404, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 18 10:22:45 my amavis[27494]: (27494-18) Passed CLEAN {RelayedInternal}, MYNETS LOCAL [127.0.0.1]:53472 <raz@local.com> -> <raz@test.com>, Queue-ID: 0151F5FE20, Message-ID: <37be-58f5bf00-1-8c43540@107650857>, mail_id: SK-UO7zCWwfS, Hits: -0.999, size: 972, queued_as: ADB22605B4, 631 ms, Tests: [ALL_TRUSTED=-1,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Apr 18 10:22:45 my postfix/smtp[14598]: 0151F5FE20: to=<raz@test.com>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=0.9, delays=0.24/0.01/0/0.65, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as ADB22605B4)
Apr 18 10:22:45 my postfix/qmgr[14580]: 0151F5FE20: removed
Apr 18 10:22:47 my postfix/smtp[14604]: Untrusted TLS connection established to mail.test.com[*.*.*.*]:25: TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)

what could be the problem?

Thank you
Raz

↧

migrate form postfix

April 18, 2017, 2:15 am

≫ Next: SpamAssassin Bayes doesn't really work

≪ Previous: Re: postscreen and Haproxy

==== Required information ====
- iRedMail version (check /etc/iredmail-release):
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version:
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL):
- Web server (Apache or Nginx):
- Manage mail accounts with iRedAdmin-Pro?
- Related log if you're reporting an issue:
====
I just installed iRedMail 0.9.6 MYSQL edition in ubuntu 16.04 with apache web server in order to move from postfix-dovecote-mysql to iRedMail.I did the following changes in /opt/www/iredadmin/libs/default_settings.py:
MAILDIR_HASHED = False
MAILDIR_PREPEND_DOMAIN = True
MAILDIR_APPEND_TIMESTAMP = False
and in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:
mail_location = maildir:%Lh/:INDEX=%Lh/
location = maildir:%%Lh/:INDEX=%%Lh/Shared/%%Ld/%%Ln
in order to make mailbox directory look like the old server, and it looks fine but the maildir field in mailbox table still look xxx.yyy/user instead of user@xxx.yyy..so i need to know how to do it.
I need to be sure of movement possibility from old postfix/dovecot to iRedMail before I move to second step which having license so any help will be much appreciated

↧